Welcome, Guest |
You have to register before you can post on our site.
|
Forum Statistics |
» Members: 1,528
» Latest member: Reagatord
» Forum threads: 2,322
» Forum posts: 22,812
Full Statistics
|
Online Users |
There are currently 92 online users. » 0 Member(s) | 89 Guest(s) Applebot, Bing, Google
|
Latest Threads |
Ian Aird
Forum: Obituaries
Last Post: amuir
18-07-2025, 07:11 AM
» Replies: 11
» Views: 1,093
|
SNCL 2025/26
Forum: General Chess Chat
Last Post: Glynis Grant
29-06-2025, 10:04 PM
» Replies: 2
» Views: 478
|
Alastair Dawson
Forum: Obituaries
Last Post: Craig Pritchett
22-06-2025, 12:19 PM
» Replies: 4
» Views: 1,484
|
world blitz
Forum: General Chess Chat
Last Post: Andy Howie
17-06-2025, 01:01 PM
» Replies: 2
» Views: 467
|
Perth Congress
Forum: Live Games
Last Post: Ianbrownlee
24-05-2025, 11:46 AM
» Replies: 1
» Views: 559
|
Perth Congress 2025
Forum: Tournaments and Events
Last Post: JMcNicoll
14-05-2025, 09:01 AM
» Replies: 0
» Views: 806
|
SNCL Round 9
Forum: Tournaments and Events
Last Post: Nicolas Skettos
29-04-2025, 07:41 PM
» Replies: 1
» Views: 796
|
2025 SNCL AGM Minutes
Forum: League Announcements
Last Post: ruairidhmckay
28-04-2025, 08:41 PM
» Replies: 0
» Views: 798
|
Livingston Allegros and B...
Forum: Tournaments and Events
Last Post: Ianbrownlee
26-04-2025, 02:58 PM
» Replies: 1
» Views: 546
|
Castlehill Allegro
Forum: Tournaments and Events
Last Post: Keith Rose
25-04-2025, 07:28 PM
» Replies: 1
» Views: 685
|
|
|
Female players in SNCL |
Posted by: robin moore - 25-11-2012, 09:45 PM - Forum: General Chess Chat
- Replies (39)
|
 |
Seeing a I am a nice relaxed non-controversial member of ChessScotland, this might not mean too much. I would love to have a female player in every SNCL team. Everyone get their politcally correct hat on and have a think about it. People like Joy, Ali and Siegrun might be on my side but I am sure that there are others who are not.
Let all ladies fight for a place in the best teams. Anna , Kirsty and Stuthi would be contenders for the top teams. How does that sound? A female in every team.
What could it mean long term?... Competition for female adult and and junior international events. Sounds good to me...
Robin.
|
|
|
Grading calculator query |
Posted by: andyburnett - 24-11-2012, 05:35 PM - Forum: Ask the Grader
- Replies (9)
|
 |
Hi, hopefully someone can explain the following problem to me...
I have downloaded the Grading calculator program and have been entering my results for this season. However, I don't understand some of the adjusted grades being used. Take the following...
Opps Adj Used
1789 1789 1849
1475 1475 1849
1885 1885 1885
2059 2179 2179
2007 2007 2007
1619 1739 1849
2216 2336 2336
1569 1569 1849
2475 2475 2475
1846 1966 1966
2175 2295 2295
...why are the figures in bold 120 points different between actual and adjusted?
Cheers,
Andy Burnett
|
|
|
Movember |
Posted by: Alan Jelfs - 24-11-2012, 01:04 PM - Forum: Non-Chess Related
- Replies (3)
|
 |
As the more observant of you will have noticed at Oban, I am again growing a 'tache for Movember, to raise funds for men's cancer.
The growth will also be on display at SNCL tomorrow.
If you would like to make a donation, please go to my "Mome Page" at
<!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://uk.movember.com/mospace/2732440">http://uk.movember.com/mospace/2732440</a><!-- m -->
Thanks,
Alan Jelfs
|
|
|
maribor round 7 |
Posted by: robin moore - 21-11-2012, 01:04 PM - Forum: The Arbiters Jotter
- Replies (12)
|
 |
Round 7 in the World youth. Liam Richmond comes out of the hall after his game finishes to tell us that he won a rook on move 19. On move 20 the chief arbiter appeared, said that his Albanian opponent was ill and was declaring the game + - for Scotland. This effectively meant we got the point but Liam would not be credited with any grading points. We sought advice from home and decided to appeal. David Deary and I spoke to the chief arbiter in his office and he produced a medical certificate for Liam's opponent timed at 14.40 which he had received at 14.55 (The game started at 15.00). The Albanian player had missed the previous two rounds through illness. We suspect that the chief arbiter may have assumed that the Albanian boy was not going to turn up but realised two and a half hours into the game that he had. We lodged our appeal and our 100 euros deposit. The three panel appeals commitee included the Fide secretary-general. After some time considering, our appeal was successful and we were given the full result plus our deposit back. Thoughts?
|
|
|
Live Boards |
Posted by: Jonathan Edwards - 19-11-2012, 12:34 AM - Forum: General Chess Chat
- Replies (54)
|
 |
As some of you may be aware, a situation arose this weekend in Oban regarding a certain player and a refusal to play on a live board. I don't want this to turn into anything personal or overly negative, but there were a large number of us seriously disgruntled by what went on that I feel it is worth raising so that something similar can either be avoided or fully clarified.
Live boards were in operation on the top 4 boards of the Open this weekend, in order that people watching could see some of the highest quality games played in Scotland purely for the entertainment and interest of spectators. After round 1, a request was made by the resident of the top board that he did not want to play on a live board, for what I believe was due to him feeling that he was disadvantaged by having games online which could be potentially used in future rounds for prep (matches are available on the same night in a database at most international tournaments by the way). As a result, you may have noticed that no moves were broadcast from this board for the rest of the event. Funnily enough, the IM in question seemed to be the only person who wasn't at the pub quiz on the Saturday night... Must've been preparing in his room for his game the next morning against my flatmate!
The reasons why some of us were upset is as follows:
These sensory boards were funded by the generous donations of CS members in order that games could be watched by people who either could not make the event, or do not play tournaments but still enjoy following them. By refusing to play on such a board seems somewhat selfish. It should also be noted that when one of Scotland's top players plays, the event becomes more interesting to everyone, including potential sponsors.
This player played the remainder of the games on a DGT board but with the transmission switched off. This seems a farce, as a perfectly functioning board was not being used to broadcast some of the other incredibly hard fought games in all 4 of the sections.
The thought of refusing due to prep issues during an event seems quite poor sportsmanship. Everyone is allowed to go and watch games, and even request to see duplicate scoresheets from the arbiter. Nobody really uses these games for preparation.
This is not meant as an attack on the person in question, but instead some clarification of what will happen in the future would be nice. As far as my own personal opinion goes, a clause should be inserted into all congresses that means all entrants agree that if they are due to play on a board which is being broadcast, it is being broadcast because the organiser feels it is something of interest to online followers, and therefore the game must be played on this board.
If anyone else has views on this it would be nice to hear them.
|
|
|
|