Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Freedom of Speech
#15
ronniewallace Wrote:George knows as a team captain himself that selection matters are devolved to the respective team captains. He chose to post a rant on the forum rather than contact the team captain in the first instance.

My point was, don't you have a private forum? Deleting a topic because it looks bad in public is easily resolved by making it private. It would also never have led to this thread being created and ending up with a wider audience.

ronniewallace Wrote:The GCL captain has subequently explained to George the reason for his non-selection for this particular match.

As a captain myself, I would have informed the player of my decision and the reasons rather than have George (the player) approach me. Surely, thats just common decency? :\

ronniewallace Wrote:You have brought this item into the open, therefore for clarity it is only fair that the full transcript of our dialogue be displayed, it is up to the readers to decide for themselves whether the text makes either of us look bad.

The only person/entity that looks bad from this topic is Cumbernauld CC. This should have remained an internal Cumbernauld CC matter. Deleting the topic on the Cumbernauld forum was the wrong decision in my view and has led to this PR disaster. Also mentioning SNCL teams etc. is just going to open even more up to debate. :\

I think a bit of common sense wouldn't go a miss here!
Growing old is compulsory, growing up is optional!
Reply


Messages In This Thread

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)