Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Richardson 2012-13
#92
Quote:6369 P Walsh (W) .5 - 0.5 J Shaw 5961

That is a tremendous result for Peter. Anyone ow knows Peter will realise there is so much more to his than just the grading figure. Absolutely terrific!

Is Peter's pnum incorrect in the above? There are two P.Walsh players in the system with very similar pnums (6369, and 6368). However, 6369 - as marked above - belongs to a Philip Walsh.

Super result irrespective of which one of them it is though. 8)
Reply


Messages In This Thread

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)