25-08-2014, 10:36 PM
[quote="David Deary"]Phil, by all means ignore my point. If the motion goes forward to the first council meeting in November with the addition of the very seperate issue of 'players refusing to play against a correctly paired opponent' then I will vote for the motion to go back to the drawing board and be split into two motions. I don't like different issues being paperclipped onto the one motion. This would result in a delay until the following council meeting in March 2015. I don't think splitting it into a seperate motion is in any way an unreasonable request. END OF QUOTE
A delay until March 2015 would not be necessary.
Council could simply vote on which of the 2 suggested wordings they prefer for this section. Which one is an amendment to the motion and which one is the original is rather irrelevant
A delay until March 2015 would not be necessary.
Council could simply vote on which of the 2 suggested wordings they prefer for this section. Which one is an amendment to the motion and which one is the original is rather irrelevant