24-08-2014, 03:43 PM
Can someone who attended the AGM update us on the current situation. I understood that amendments would be added to the original motion (shall becomes should etc) that would mean that the motion became guidelines only and could not be enforced at any CS or independent event. I believed that Steve and Andy were "angling for option 2" which supported a guidelines only proposal.
Were the amendments published on the CS website and presented as such to the AGM?
What was the outcome of any voting?
Does this disability motion at the top of this thread "overrule" Steve and Andy's amended motion?
I am not clear how the motion can now be enforced (according to Andy).
Were the amendments published on the CS website and presented as such to the AGM?
What was the outcome of any voting?
Does this disability motion at the top of this thread "overrule" Steve and Andy's amended motion?
I am not clear how the motion can now be enforced (according to Andy).