Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Motion 1 (wording to go to Council)
#7
Matthew Turner Wrote:Rule 2 is just unnecessarily wordy. Why not just say No player has the right to refuse meet a player against whom they has been correctly paired. At present you are singling out disability, why not race religion or gender?

Rule 5 Can you explain what this actually means. Can you envision a circumstance where it would be invoked?

Matt, this is guidelines for Disabled players so we are kind of singling them out but I do take the point!

I know of a league that would penalise a disabled player who could not score by taking time off their clock so I actually do know of circumstances where this happens
"How sad to see, what used to be, a model of decorum and tranquility become like any other sport, a battleground for rival ideologies to slug it out with glee"
Reply


Messages In This Thread

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)