Posts: 22
Threads: 1
Joined: Nov 2011
Reputation:
0
Bon Accord and Wandering Dragons will play in Dundee on 4th February with the agreement of both captains.
Posts: 995
Threads: 94
Joined: Sep 2011
Reputation:
2
Draws now made:
Richardson Cup:
B Accord or W Dragons VS Polytechnic
Edinburgh West VS Dundee
Spens :
Castlehill VS Phones
East Kilbride/Edinburgh 2 VS Kilmarnock
Campbell Cup:
Round 1 – E Kilbride/Edinburgh 2 VS Civ Service
Semi Final - Irvine VS E Kilbride/Edinburgh / Civ Service
Hamilton 2 VS Troon
Further results:
Phones 3.5 Irvine 2.5,
Edinburgh 2 are reinstated as E Kilbride did not wish to claim match
Semi-finals on 17 March
Could E Kilbride play Edinburgh in the next two weeks please as the loser has to play Civ Service in the Campbell before 17 March ?
Please could I have board scores for grading for Phones/Irvine &
Hamilton B/Kilmarnock matches ?
Andrew
Posts: 995
Threads: 94
Joined: Sep 2011
Reputation:
2
could someone please tell me result of e kilbride v edinburgh ? captains not been in tough
Posts: 462
Threads: 14
Joined: Aug 2011
Reputation:
1
Can we try and change the format next year? It's hard to get excited about a knock out with 3 rounds.
Posts: 462
Threads: 14
Joined: Aug 2011
Reputation:
1
Before you ask, here is my proposition. Adjustments could be made depending on entries, of course.
Teams are seeded into 2 groups using average elo e.g. group A would have seeds 1, 3, 5, 7, 9.
Games played at a neutral central venue e.g. Grangemouth/Glenrothes/Perth/Stirling.
Group stages are all-play-alls with 2 matches played per group, per day - 1 team sits out.
The semis and final are knock outs.
That gives a maximum of 6 matches.
What do people think?
Group Stages (teams shown are for example only)
Group A
Bearsden
Bon Accord
Cathcart
Dundee & Victoria
Edinburgh
Group B
Edinburgh West
Glasgow Polytechnic
Hamilton
Oban
Wandering Dragons
Semi Finals
Winner group B vs Runner-up group A
Winner group A vs Runner up group B
Final
Winner of semi-final A vs Winner of semi-final B = Champions.
Posts: 995
Threads: 94
Joined: Sep 2011
Reputation:
2
Alan - your suggestion makes it too similar to SNCL
If I dont get a response from E Kilbride/Edinburgh soon, will have to default them
Posts: 667
Threads: 70
Joined: Aug 2011
Reputation:
0
amuir Wrote:Alan - your suggestion makes it too similar to SNCL
Doesn't make it a bad idea. SNCL is quite succesful. I quite like Alan Tate's proposition, although I'd perhaps tweak it a little, to minimise the cost of venue hire for the initial group stages. Four groups of four, for example.
<!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://www.scotchesstour.co.uk">http://www.scotchesstour.co.uk</a><!-- m -->
Posts: 462
Threads: 14
Joined: Aug 2011
Reputation:
1
Any way to get more rounds should work- 4 groups of 4 would require 16 teams. Don't know about the SNCL but am assuming it does not have a semi-final and final.