29-03-2022, 10:26 PM
Hamish said the following: -
Jim for example referenced this document https://www.chessscotland.com/internatio...sentation/ and claimed it was the same as the motion (accompanied with a generous offer to enlarge the size of the link).
However the residency in that document is "permanently resident" , whereas Douglas had clarified earlier that the residency now is just any residency, including students.
***
But the full statements says :-
Is this not a more complete conditionally requirement Hamish?
Jim for example referenced this document https://www.chessscotland.com/internatio...sentation/ and claimed it was the same as the motion (accompanied with a generous offer to enlarge the size of the link).
However the residency in that document is "permanently resident" , whereas Douglas had clarified earlier that the residency now is just any residency, including students.
***
But the full statements says :-
- If the player is 18 or more years old, has he/she been permanently resident in Scotland for at least two years (if a junior, that is under 18, the equivalent time is one year) ?
Is this not a more complete conditionally requirement Hamish?