Poll: How should the Sensory Boards be funded
You do not have permission to vote in this poll.
By Donation (individuals and congresses)
44.12%
15 44.12%
Increasing congress entry fees by £1 (going towards the costs)
23.53%
8 23.53%
Congresses using the boards paying a hire charge of £50
8.82%
3 8.82%
Congresses using the boards paying a hire charge of £75
2.94%
1 2.94%
Congresses using the boards paying an extra 5p per graded result
8.82%
3 8.82%
I do not think Chess Scotland should use such boards
11.76%
4 11.76%
Total 34 vote(s) 100%
* You voted for this item. [Show Results]

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Sensory Boards
#25
J*R Wrote:I could be wrong, but I can't recall any other events in England or Europe where expensive sensorary boards are used to broadcast games between players who could be as lowely rated as 1200.

Well then I think CS are being more innovative than these other countries. Big Grin

I don't think people watch the lower graded live boards because they want to see brilliantly accurate Chess, I think they watch them for exactly the opposite reason. Surely something which generates more interest in the events, is worth giving a shot; and it seemed to be a bit of a hit at the last event.

Your viewpoint is like suggesting that we shouldn't watch women's tennis anymore because the men are obviously the best in the world! =) When I want to see good tennis I watch the top 5 men, when I want to see Maria Sharapova and Co. I watch the women. :U
Reply


Messages In This Thread

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 4 Guest(s)