Poll: How should the Sensory Boards be funded
You do not have permission to vote in this poll.
By Donation (individuals and congresses)
44.12%
15 44.12%
Increasing congress entry fees by £1 (going towards the costs)
23.53%
8 23.53%
Congresses using the boards paying a hire charge of £50
8.82%
3 8.82%
Congresses using the boards paying a hire charge of £75
2.94%
1 2.94%
Congresses using the boards paying an extra 5p per graded result
8.82%
3 8.82%
I do not think Chess Scotland should use such boards
11.76%
4 11.76%
Total 34 vote(s) 100%
* You voted for this item. [Show Results]

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Sensory Boards
#7
I know there is a case for keeping the viewing of live games free to get maximum number of hits so as to attract a sponsor however as the viewers are arguably the main beneficiaries of live games, it does seem unfair if they make no contribution. I would suggest that a basic service remains free but a pay-per-view premium service is also provided that might include:-
commentary
messaging to discuss games with other users
vote for best game / move - could be linked to prize for players
post game analysis

Perhaps a board can be used for post match analysis either in the way of master game commentary from the players or perhaps as a lesson by a higher rated player going through a selected game.

The idea of having a best live game (or move?) voted for by viewers could be used to spice up the bids for being on a live board - the higher your bid the higher your potential prize if your game gets the most hits/votes from the viewers.
Reply


Messages In This Thread

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)