Poll: How should the Sensory Boards be funded
You do not have permission to vote in this poll.
By Donation (individuals and congresses)
44.12%
15 44.12%
Increasing congress entry fees by £1 (going towards the costs)
23.53%
8 23.53%
Congresses using the boards paying a hire charge of £50
8.82%
3 8.82%
Congresses using the boards paying a hire charge of £75
2.94%
1 2.94%
Congresses using the boards paying an extra 5p per graded result
8.82%
3 8.82%
I do not think Chess Scotland should use such boards
11.76%
4 11.76%
Total 34 vote(s) 100%
* You voted for this item. [Show Results]

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Sensory Boards
#94
The only figures I could find are for the 2009 Champiolnships

Total for 7 rounds 4,465,585 with visitors of 8,873

11/Jul/2009 593 (6.7%)
12/Jul/2009 869 (9.8%)
13/Jul/2009 1072 (12.1%)
14/Jul/2009 1463 (16.5%)
15/Jul/2009 1680 (18.9%)
16/Jul/2009 1588 (17.9%)
17/Jul/2009 1608 (18.1%)

18/Jul requests were 1,024,045 with the number of visitors counted at 1,495

I don't have figures for round 9

These numbers are just the tip of the iceberg as the games are also transmitted on Chessbase et al.

If you want your event to have status then you need the sensory boards. To gain sponsorship of any significance you need a significant web presence. The live game coverage ensures this.
Reply


Messages In This Thread

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)