07-01-2014, 11:08 PM
Phil
I don't want to belabour the point. Initially, my post was blocked because my browser could not connect with the Board, which was declared to be busy - presumably you and Matthew squeezed in ahead of me. But, the fact is my post was written without sight of yours or Matthew's. Yet, Matthew drew exactly the conclusion about the named personality that your image was intended to achieve. That's why your image/question is 'inadmissible'. It's potentially libellous, and I for one do not want to be associated with it.
Your point about motorists deliberately slowing down in the fast lane because of the near presence of a Police car simply shows that some motorists don't know the law. So, it's not a very persuasive argument in your favour.
Splitting hairs? No.
Looks like Matthew was driving faster than me again!
I don't want to belabour the point. Initially, my post was blocked because my browser could not connect with the Board, which was declared to be busy - presumably you and Matthew squeezed in ahead of me. But, the fact is my post was written without sight of yours or Matthew's. Yet, Matthew drew exactly the conclusion about the named personality that your image was intended to achieve. That's why your image/question is 'inadmissible'. It's potentially libellous, and I for one do not want to be associated with it.
Your point about motorists deliberately slowing down in the fast lane because of the near presence of a Police car simply shows that some motorists don't know the law. So, it's not a very persuasive argument in your favour.
Splitting hairs? No.
Looks like Matthew was driving faster than me again!