21-08-2013, 12:57 PM
Andy B
I take very seriously the blocking of any motion whether Robert's, mine or anyones. I don't remember it having been done before and it is indicative of dictatorship, censorship and control. What matters in the future will be blocked?
Constructive advice has been taken on board for members to vote. The noticeboard does not have a unilateral view.
The respondent asked me to resign in order to stop the motion being discussed. I believe that with Michael Hanley and Phil Thomas becoming non members he was simply going through the Hamilton members one by one, removing them from the situation. I don't see a lot of contrition, reconciliation or dialogue from the respondent, only troublemaking over the period of his ban.
For Hamish, Andy H and Dick, the 3 powerful men, to create a wall of silence is not on.
I see the same arguments over the next 12 months in junior chess unless these problems are discussed
I take very seriously the blocking of any motion whether Robert's, mine or anyones. I don't remember it having been done before and it is indicative of dictatorship, censorship and control. What matters in the future will be blocked?
Constructive advice has been taken on board for members to vote. The noticeboard does not have a unilateral view.
The respondent asked me to resign in order to stop the motion being discussed. I believe that with Michael Hanley and Phil Thomas becoming non members he was simply going through the Hamilton members one by one, removing them from the situation. I don't see a lot of contrition, reconciliation or dialogue from the respondent, only troublemaking over the period of his ban.
For Hamish, Andy H and Dick, the 3 powerful men, to create a wall of silence is not on.
I see the same arguments over the next 12 months in junior chess unless these problems are discussed