Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
AGM Candidates
This just looks like an attempt to lynch a particular individual despite the Chess Scotland incident process being complete.

The incident was sent to the Standards committee who made their decision. This was then appealed and the appeals committee made their decision. As far as the whole process goes that is this issue finished. This was the process at the time of the incident, draw a line in the sand and move on.

If you do not like the process of how Chess Scotland manage incidents and feel so strongly about it then you should spend this time instead looking at ways to improve the process.
Reply


Messages In This Thread

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 5 Guest(s)