23-07-2013, 01:14 PM
Must jump in here to support the Andys & Hugh
The fact that the majority of the censored posts are asserted to be 'criticisms' of Chess Scotland and its officials is more a reflection on the subject matter of the majority of the offending posts. To suggest that the CS president has nobbled the moderators (and the standards committee to boot) is just daft.
The fact that the moderators miss some posts is not evidence of some conspiracy. I have no doubt that, if you care to look, there are posts that are critical of CS et al that have not been removed.
The fact that the majority of the censored posts are asserted to be 'criticisms' of Chess Scotland and its officials is more a reflection on the subject matter of the majority of the offending posts. To suggest that the CS president has nobbled the moderators (and the standards committee to boot) is just daft.
The fact that the moderators miss some posts is not evidence of some conspiracy. I have no doubt that, if you care to look, there are posts that are critical of CS et al that have not been removed.