17-07-2013, 11:05 PM
Point 1. Agree with Andy Burnett on this Legally this cannot be enforced A court of Law takes precedent over Chess Scotland
point 2. This may be doable but again naming someone in a proven complaint may be on dodgy ground. The wording would have to be particulate
Point 3. This is double barrelled. I'm not convinced a complaint without a speedy resolution is productive at all. Also it would smack of settling old scores and a slanging match. The exceptions to this are if a situation of an alleged complaint develops either by new information of if an alleged crime is committed when the police should then involved
I just think further thought is required on these points although I'm perplexed at the chess addict comment Sorry but I just don't understand it
point 2. This may be doable but again naming someone in a proven complaint may be on dodgy ground. The wording would have to be particulate
Point 3. This is double barrelled. I'm not convinced a complaint without a speedy resolution is productive at all. Also it would smack of settling old scores and a slanging match. The exceptions to this are if a situation of an alleged complaint develops either by new information of if an alleged crime is committed when the police should then involved
I just think further thought is required on these points although I'm perplexed at the chess addict comment Sorry but I just don't understand it