15-08-2012, 07:25 PM
Craig Pritchett Wrote:...would have more sympathy for the motion, which essentially abolishes the residency principle entirely (and should surely be framed that way),
The motion, if Andy M ever manages to create a form of words that capture his intention clearly, does not abolish the residency principle. It amends it.
A non Scot who is resident in this country can, after a period of time indicated by CS rules, apply to be given a SCO code in the FIDE rating system. It doesn't matter whether they are an existing FIDE rated player or an unrated new player.
If the player gets a SCO code they are eligible for the Scottish title.
If a player does not wish to be listed with a SCO code or to switch from their existing country then they are not eligible for the title.
BTW: of course the timing of this motion is poor immediately after Jacob wins. He has done more in his 8 years than many "ordinarily resident" SCO players.
In that case maybe one of the other issues Jacob mentions in his blog should be addressed. The tie break system for the Scottish Championships favours lower rated players.
In fact since Alex is keen to have systems which cover the miracle of an unrated winning the title - how would you deal with such a player under the existing Actual - Expected tie-break when they wont have any expected.