05-09-2011, 09:34 PM
Just read through the previous thread on this subject and found no reason given for requiring poster's names to be public knowledge. Several references were made to an AGM motion but that was shown to be incorrect as it only required that the posters be know to the admin. Some expressed the view that they could not understand why anyone would not want to use their own name but that is hardly an irrefutable argument for enforcing the policy - in fact it is no arguement at all.
Can anyone who has voted for the use of full names put forward a reasoned argument for it?
Can anyone who has voted for the use of full names put forward a reasoned argument for it?