Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Inverness Congress
#11
Ok that makes sense. Understand that it is a bit awkward and people who played >2200 player(s) would have less FIDE rated games.

On the other hand it does allow more people to play and I do think rating is just a number at the end of the day - for me it's better to have more players playing even if those games are only rated by Chessscotland. (I would say that though!).
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Inverness Congress - by JMcNicoll - 31-08-2018, 09:07 AM
RE: Inverness Congress - by JMcNicoll - 31-08-2018, 04:46 PM
RE: Inverness Congress - by David Deary - 01-09-2018, 07:29 AM
RE: Inverness Congress - by JMcNicoll - 07-09-2018, 09:31 AM
RE: Inverness Congress - by hamish olson - 07-09-2018, 10:32 AM
RE: Inverness Congress - by George Neave - 08-09-2018, 12:27 PM
RE: Inverness Congress - by JMcNicoll - 08-09-2018, 12:49 PM
RE: Inverness Congress - by Dave Burke - 08-09-2018, 01:08 PM
RE: Inverness Congress - by hamish olson - 09-09-2018, 08:04 PM
RE: Inverness Congress - by JMcNicoll - 10-09-2018, 01:17 PM
RE: Inverness Congress - by hamish olson - 10-09-2018, 05:12 PM
RE: Inverness Congress - by George Neave - 11-09-2018, 07:12 PM
RE: Inverness Congress - by JMcNicoll - 12-09-2018, 07:08 PM
RE: Inverness Congress - by ruairidhmckay - 15-09-2018, 12:28 PM
RE: Inverness Congress - by andybburnett - 15-09-2018, 04:50 PM
RE: Inverness Congress - by Andrew Greet - 19-09-2018, 04:36 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)