8 hours ago
(This post was last modified: 8 hours ago by Jim Webster.)
David
You posted that earlier posts contained disinformation - I must challenge this
1. The website contains only 8 clubs listed and still does - fact
2. The constitution reference is valid and accurate - fact
There is no outraged, simply stated the facts above and asking realistic concerns based on the available data. Expressing opinions is not disinformation nor is an outrage
How is this disinformation when using publicly available data and expressing an opinion?
I it indeed fortunate, and welcome news, that so many clubs have renewed the CS Memberships and await the updated list in due time.
I note that the Membership Secretary has indeed individual membership list was updated on 4 November.
You posted that earlier posts contained disinformation - I must challenge this
1. The website contains only 8 clubs listed and still does - fact
2. The constitution reference is valid and accurate - fact
There is no outraged, simply stated the facts above and asking realistic concerns based on the available data. Expressing opinions is not disinformation nor is an outrage
How is this disinformation when using publicly available data and expressing an opinion?
I it indeed fortunate, and welcome news, that so many clubs have renewed the CS Memberships and await the updated list in due time.
I note that the Membership Secretary has indeed individual membership list was updated on 4 November.