27-06-2015, 11:11 PM
Hi Martin,
I don't know the actual reason behind this change, but I can see a simple 'arithmetical' problem...
SCA = 1 adult vote SJCA= 1 junior (or guardian/proxy) vote
CS = 1 adult+1 junior (or guardian by proxy) vote on 'adult' matters AND 1 adult+ 1 junior(or guardian by proxy) vote on 'junior' matters.
No idea if it worked/works this way, but sounds plausible and not obviously a good state of affairs?!
I don't know the actual reason behind this change, but I can see a simple 'arithmetical' problem...
SCA = 1 adult vote SJCA= 1 junior (or guardian/proxy) vote
CS = 1 adult+1 junior (or guardian by proxy) vote on 'adult' matters AND 1 adult+ 1 junior(or guardian by proxy) vote on 'junior' matters.
No idea if it worked/works this way, but sounds plausible and not obviously a good state of affairs?!