Directors' reports

[Derek Howie]

...... no directors have responded to my previous post?

Are the directors required to answer, or even read, forum posts?

Are you suggesting that directors are not obliged to communicate with members?

The directors are obliged to adhere to the constitution, and the accounts have not been made available in line with the constitution.

There was a commitment made on the forum that the accounts would be made available before today and it seems a reasonable way of asking the question.

The forum is an official forum of CS and it would be good practice for all CS directors to use it to communicate with members. Communication with members could be improved and one of the better ways to do it would be by use of the forum. All members can then have access to the answer. Surely open communication is better than little or no communication?

Further more the calling notice for the council meeting says

Can we please request that anyone wanting to raise anything for the meeting, do so to Andy by the 8th.

I'm not sure what your point is and why you think it's unreasonable for a member to expect an answer on such an important issue. Are you suggesting that the only way for a member to ask about the accounts is to have it raised at Council?