17-11-2019, 07:34 PM
Hi Alan
I am commenting as a CS member and not admin director. I believe the process lies with the proposer submitting the motion who also supplies the names of the seconders.. Mathew indicated his intention way back in July when he named his seconders on the forum. I also believe he also followed the correct procedure in formally submitting the motion. I presume he would have checked with you as the seconder what exactly the wording on the motion should be and if you were happy with it. In other words the communication to Chess Scotland comes from the proposer and nowhere else. Are you now suggesting we now check every seconder for validity for every motion or are you just making a general enquiry. I am also surprised and shocked to find you were unaware of being put forwarded as a seconder for that motion
I am commenting as a CS member and not admin director. I believe the process lies with the proposer submitting the motion who also supplies the names of the seconders.. Mathew indicated his intention way back in July when he named his seconders on the forum. I also believe he also followed the correct procedure in formally submitting the motion. I presume he would have checked with you as the seconder what exactly the wording on the motion should be and if you were happy with it. In other words the communication to Chess Scotland comes from the proposer and nowhere else. Are you now suggesting we now check every seconder for validity for every motion or are you just making a general enquiry. I am also surprised and shocked to find you were unaware of being put forwarded as a seconder for that motion