12-11-2019, 07:54 PM
Thanks Gerald.
For clarity, I identified the problems before the motion was even presented to the AGM and had expected it to be declared incompetent as it (a) confused matters and (b) did not address at all the 5 year rule for non-SCOs.
As an example of how badly the motion was worded, if Mark Orr stayed in Edinburgh he could not win a Scottish title but if he moved to Dublin (or anywhere outside of Scotland) he would have still been eligible for a Scottish title under one of the criteria but prevented under another.
Catch 22 doesn't have a look-in.
For clarity, I identified the problems before the motion was even presented to the AGM and had expected it to be declared incompetent as it (a) confused matters and (b) did not address at all the 5 year rule for non-SCOs.
As an example of how badly the motion was worded, if Mark Orr stayed in Edinburgh he could not win a Scottish title but if he moved to Dublin (or anywhere outside of Scotland) he would have still been eligible for a Scottish title under one of the criteria but prevented under another.
Catch 22 doesn't have a look-in.