28-05-2013, 04:52 PM
DNA evidence is used in court to convict people of murder. Why? The probability of DNA evidence being wrong is so incredibly remote that if we didn't consider it conclusive then we couldn't really conceivably consider anything conclusive. The odds of Ivanov matching the computer to the extent that he did are similarly remote. Coupled with the circumstantial evidence of his performance dropping significantly when the live broadcast stopped, we are presented with an even stronger case.
Ivanov was cheating, it really is as simple and obvious as that.
Ivanov was cheating, it really is as simple and obvious as that.