20-07-2012, 02:33 PM
Hi Mathew
Of course if Clement Sreeves had played the Double Bishop sac and under promoting
to a Bishop variation in his Round 7 game v Michael Grove then Clement would have won it.
Yes?
[pgn][FEN "7r/2p3p1/2k4p/4bpN1/P7/2P2b2/5PpP/1R4K1 w - - 0 1"]
1. Rf1 {Clement now took the Rook (g2xR=Q) and White resigned. Boring, I'll be having words with Clement. How about....} 1... Bxh2+ {The first Bishop sac.} 2. Kxh2 hxg5+ 3. Kg3 gxf1=B {Two light squared Bishops, that is fairly unique.} 4. Kxf3 {There goes the 2nd Bishop.} 4... Rh3# {Checkmate. All brilliancy games should end in checkmate.}[/pgn]
Of course if Clement Sreeves had played the Double Bishop sac and under promoting
to a Bishop variation in his Round 7 game v Michael Grove then Clement would have won it.
Yes?
[pgn][FEN "7r/2p3p1/2k4p/4bpN1/P7/2P2b2/5PpP/1R4K1 w - - 0 1"]
1. Rf1 {Clement now took the Rook (g2xR=Q) and White resigned. Boring, I'll be having words with Clement. How about....} 1... Bxh2+ {The first Bishop sac.} 2. Kxh2 hxg5+ 3. Kg3 gxf1=B {Two light squared Bishops, that is fairly unique.} 4. Kxf3 {There goes the 2nd Bishop.} 4... Rh3# {Checkmate. All brilliancy games should end in checkmate.}[/pgn]