02-05-2012, 09:30 AM
Oooh dear... I haven't posted in quite some time but felt I had to come out of hibernation for this one.
What a bizzare decision.
Phil is correct in that Andy has the right to direct as is his role. However, members have the right to question his decision making and if they choose to use the forum to do it - thats fine! I would suggest those unhappy express their displeasure at the AGM with their votes.
Personally, I can't believe this decision. As a CS member who contributes by paying an annual membership I am not happy to know my membership fee (whatever the minute percentage of it) is going to fund a non CS member, non playing GM to captain the teams. How much is this costing? I hope he is actually going to do something and its not a jolly... =)
What a bizzare decision.
Phil is correct in that Andy has the right to direct as is his role. However, members have the right to question his decision making and if they choose to use the forum to do it - thats fine! I would suggest those unhappy express their displeasure at the AGM with their votes.
Personally, I can't believe this decision. As a CS member who contributes by paying an annual membership I am not happy to know my membership fee (whatever the minute percentage of it) is going to fund a non CS member, non playing GM to captain the teams. How much is this costing? I hope he is actually going to do something and its not a jolly... =)
Growing old is compulsory, growing up is optional!