Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
what does Phil Thomas play as black
#21
Proxy pawns? Proxy moves?
Reply
#22
another alternative is the following from last year; Phil is black of course.
1. Nf3 Nf6 2. c4 e6 3. b3 c5 4. Bb2 Be7 5. g3 O-O 6. Bg2 d6 7. O-O Nbd7 8. Nc3 Rb8 9. d4 a6 10. a4 h6 11. Rc1 Nh7 12. e3 Qc7 13. Nd2 f5 14. f4 Ndf6 15. Qe2 Re8 16. Nf3 b6 17. Rfd1 Bb7 18. d5 exd5 19. cxd5 Kf7 20. Qd3 g6 21. Nh4 Bf8 22. e4 Bg7 23. exf5 g5 24. fxg5 hxg5 25. Nf3 Ng4 26. Re1 Ne5 27. Qd2 Bf6 28. Ne4 Nxf3 29. Bxf3 Bxb2 30. Qxb2 Re5 31. Nxd6 Qxd6 32. Rxe5 Nf6 33. Re6 Qd8 34. Rce1 g4 35. Re7
Reply
#23
or
1. e4 d5
2. exd5 Nf6
3. Nc3 Bg4
4. Be2 Bxe2
5. Qxe2 Nxd5
6. Qb5+ c6
7. Qxb7 e6
8. Nf3 Nb6
9. Ne5 Qf6
10. Nxc6 Bc5
11. Ne4 Bxf2+
12. Nxf2 O-O
13. Nxb8 Raxb8
14. Qe4 Rfd8
15. O-O Rd4
16. Qe2 Nd5
17. d3 Rh4
18. Ne4 Qe5
19. g3 Rh5
20. c4 Qd4+
21. Qf2 Qxf2+
22. Rxf2 Nb4
23. Bf4 Rd8
24. a3 Nxd3
25. Rd2 e5
26. Be3 f5
27. Nf2
Reply
#24
Patrick McGovern Wrote:another alternative is the following from last year; Phil is black of course.
1. Nf3 Nf6 2. c4 e6 3. b3 c5 4. Bb2 Be7 5. g3 O-O 6. Bg2 d6 7. O-O Nbd7 8. Nc3 Rb8 9. d4 a6 10. a4 h6 11. Rc1 Nh7 12. e3 Qc7 13. Nd2 f5 14. f4 Ndf6 15. Qe2 Re8 16. Nf3 b6 17. Rfd1 Bb7 18. d5 exd5 19. cxd5 Kf7 20. Qd3 g6 21. Nh4 Bf8 22. e4 Bg7 23. exf5 g5 24. fxg5 hxg5 25. Nf3 Ng4 26. Re1 Ne5 27. Qd2 Bf6 28. Ne4 Nxf3 29. Bxf3 Bxb2 30. Qxb2 Re5 31. Nxd6 Qxd6 32. Rxe5 Nf6 33. Re6 Qd8 34. Rce1 g4 35. Re7
White A. Grant
Black P.Thomas

Scottish Championship round 4
10th July 2012

Alan delayed d4 until move 9 now that is a sneaky d4 opening.
Reply
#25
Dahri R Green v Phil Thomas[pgn]1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 e6 3. Nc3 Bb4 4. Nf3 c5 5. e3 Nc6 6. Bd3 Bxc3 7. bxc3 d6 8. e4 e5 9. d5 Ne7 10. Nh4 h6 11. f4 Ng6 12. Nxg6 fxg6 13. fxe5 dxe5 14. Be3 b6 15. O-O O-O 16. a4 a5 17. Rb1 Bd7 18. Rb2 Rb8 19. Rbf2 Qe7 20. Bc2 g5 21. Bd2 Qe8 22. Be1 Qg6 23. Qd3 Nh5 24. Rxf8 Rxf8 25. Rxf8 Kxf8 26. Bd1 Nf4 27. Qc2 Bxa4[/pgn]
<!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://www.scotchesstour.co.uk">http://www.scotchesstour.co.uk</a><!-- m -->
Reply
#26
Patrick McGovern Wrote:or
1. e4 d5
2. exd5 Nf6
3. Nc3 Bg4
4. Be2 Bxe2
5. Qxe2 Nxd5
6. Qb5+ c6
7. Qxb7 e6
8. Nf3 Nb6
9. Ne5 Qf6
10. Nxc6 Bc5
11. Ne4 Bxf2+
12. Nxf2 O-O
13. Nxb8 Raxb8
14. Qe4 Rfd8
15. O-O Rd4
16. Qe2 Nd5
17. d3 Rh4
18. Ne4 Qe5
19. g3 Rh5
20. c4 Qd4+
21. Qf2 Qxf2+
22. Rxf2 Nb4
23. Bf4 Rd8
24. a3 Nxd3
25. Rd2 e5
26. Be3 f5
27. Nf2

White H Milligan
Black PThomas
4NCL 23rd September 2000

The worst game of mine in the database.
Slightly off topic here unless Helen switched here e and d pawns just before start of play.

And when was 2000 recent?

I know .... 2001

It look as though Pat has borrowed a time machine.

The best thing about lending someone your time machine is that you will get it back straight away
Reply
#27
Quote:And when was 2000 recent?

Phil went that far back looking for a black win for you and gave up at 2000 Smile
Reply
#28
Patrick McGovern Wrote:
Quote:And when was 2000 recent?

Phil went that far back looking for a black win for you and gave up at 2000 Smile

Pat,
this is not a standards committee enquiry. You could have asked me when my last black wins were. They were Round 1 this weekend at Marymass on 16th August 2013 and Round 5 at Marymass on 18th August 2013.

I didn't poke fun at you when you (as top grade in your section) scored this weekend only 2/5. That would have been troll like behaviour whether or not I were to put a smiley face after my posting. If you can't find any games of mine where I faced d4 then you are going off topic yet again.

Your contributions to this thread, as currently phrased, are meaningless. Go and find someone more attractive and more interesting than me to stalk.
Reply
#29
Before this kicks off again down the usual channels I was referring to standards committee case 1204 against Michael Hanley. This case should have been time barred by 66 days but appeared 11 days before the Council meeting and all the controversy raging at the time. Investigations stopped very soon after Michael pointed out that I was a key witness to the incident. The case was formally dropped after the council meeting after Michael had agreed to rewrite his directors report.

Straying off topic I know but it is essential for the future of CS that the standards committee are seen to be independent of the executive.

My suggestion is to reinvent the jury system. Let cases be judged by random adult members of CS who do not have a clearly defined conflict of interests. These people are by definition capable of jury service and deciding whether or not to convict those accused of serious crimes. Petty squabbles in the chess world would be far easier to judge than serving in a major criminal trial.
Reply
#30
Phil

I'm amazed - you never seem to give up with you and the standards committee.

What was clearly a light hearted remark about chess, you turn round once again and take it off track to your own private vendetta.

Oh dear!
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)