Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Rules why bother if no harm
#1
After my morning game at SNCL and my opponent had left I started to play a few moves- I would not have been long but a blue meanie arbiter pounced and said I was breaking FIDE rules. I asked who had complained, what harm (I was quiet)?  Rules are rules!  Maybe it is time to stop voting for FIDE rated tournaments.  I almost lost my jacket because of that arbiter - I was so upset.  If I had disturbed someone else then I would accept that I was wrong but no one was disturbed.  If we are going to be so strict then it should apply to organisers and arbiters as well - Blackpool does not comply with FIDE standard height of tables as I have pointed out to them. Rule 11.3.1 does not ban analysis after play but only during play on another board. Note that rule 12.2 © states that it is the arbiters duty to maintain a good playing environment and this has already been defined by FIDE to inclide table height, space betwwen tables and lighting etc.
Good sense is of all things in the world the most equally distributed, for everybody thinks himself so abundantly provided with it, that even those most difficult to please do not commonly desire more of it than they already possess. Descartes
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Rules why bother if no harm - by donaldheron - 03-11-2019, 10:47 PM
RE: Rules why bother if no harm - by Glynis Grant - 06-11-2019, 07:43 PM
RE: Rules why bother if no harm - by donaldheron - 07-11-2019, 04:09 PM
RE: Rules why bother if no harm - by donaldheron - 07-11-2019, 07:25 PM
RE: Rules why bother if no harm - by Ianbrownlee - 07-11-2019, 05:17 PM
RE: Rules why bother if no harm - by JMcNicoll - 08-11-2019, 10:03 AM
RE: Rules why bother if no harm - by donaldheron - 08-11-2019, 08:18 PM
RE: Rules why bother if no harm - by Glynis Grant - 21-11-2019, 04:47 PM
RE: Rules why bother if no harm - by Ianbrownlee - 22-11-2019, 04:59 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)